talk@lists.collectionspace.org
Targeted discussion among implementers and between implementers and the CollectionSpace development team
View all threadsHierarchy contexts not sorted
The Narrower and Equivalent contexts in the hierarchy section of records (storage locations, for instance) do not seem to be sorted in a meaningful way. I thought I saw an issue in Jira about this, but now I can't seem to find it. Is this a know problem, or do I perhaps have something misconfigured?
Peter
Peter Murray
Dev/Ops Lead and Project Manager
Cherry Hill Company
Perhaps you might have seen this issue, Peter?
https://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/CSPACE-4805
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Peter Murray pmurray@chillco.com wrote:
The Narrower and Equivalent contexts in the hierarchy section of records
(storage locations, for instance) do not seem to be sorted in a meaningful
way. I thought I saw an issue in Jira about this, but now I can't seem to
find it. Is this a know problem, or do I perhaps have something
misconfigured?
Peter
Peter Murray
Dev/Ops Lead and Project Manager
Cherry Hill Company
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org
Yes, that was it -- thanks Aron. I wonder why my searches weren't picking it up...
Peter
On Dec 15, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Aron Roberts aron@socrates.berkeley.edu wrote:
Perhaps you might have seen this issue, Peter?
https://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/CSPACE-4805 https://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/CSPACE-4805
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Peter Murray <pmurray@chillco.com mailto:pmurray@chillco.com> wrote:
The Narrower and Equivalent contexts in the hierarchy section of records (storage locations, for instance) do not seem to be sorted in a meaningful way. I thought I saw an issue in Jira about this, but now I can't seem to find it. Is this a know problem, or do I perhaps have something misconfigured?
Peter
--
Peter Murray
Dev/Ops Lead and Project Manager
Cherry Hill Company
Some CollectionSpace issues just aren't readily findable via obvious
keywords, alas.
I eventually found this one via a search on "sorted AND narrower" (as in
"narrower context": the child nodes in a hierarchy).
Aron
P.S. Whenever you - or anyone - find an issue and would like to be able to
search for it again via more obvious keywords, or help others more readily
find it later on, one option I've used is to just stuff those keywords into
a "finding aid" comment, perhaps similar to these:
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Peter Murray pmurray@chillco.com wrote:
Yes, that was it -- thanks Aron. I wonder why my searches weren't picking
it up...
Peter
On Dec 15, 2015, at 3:37 PM, Aron Roberts aron@socrates.berkeley.edu
wrote:
Perhaps you might have seen this issue, Peter?
https://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/CSPACE-4805
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Peter Murray pmurray@chillco.com
wrote:
The Narrower and Equivalent contexts in the hierarchy section of records
(storage locations, for instance) do not seem to be sorted in a meaningful
way. I thought I saw an issue in Jira about this, but now I can't seem to
find it. Is this a know problem, or do I perhaps have something
misconfigured?
Peter
--
Peter Murray
Dev/Ops Lead and Project Manager
Cherry Hill Company
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org
Peter,
It appears that the App/UI layer are simply using the order returned by the Service layer -which returns them in the order in which the relationships between the terms were created. For example, the most recent relationship is first in a list.
Please feel free to vote for https://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/CSPACE-4805 if you'd like to see this addressed sooner than later.
-Richard
From: Talk talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org on behalf of Peter Murray pmurray@chillco.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 11:13 AM
To: CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
The Narrower and Equivalent contexts in the hierarchy section of records (storage locations, for instance) do not seem to be sorted in a meaningful way. I thought I saw an issue in Jira about this, but now I can't seem to find it. Is this a know problem, or do I perhaps have something misconfigured?
Peter
Peter Murray
Dev/Ops Lead and Project Manager
Cherry Hill Company
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org
And, Peter, needless to say, I didn't consider the issue "minor" when
I created it back in 2012: it got demoted.
Susan
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Richard Millet
richard.millet@lyrasis.org wrote:
Peter,
It appears that the App/UI layer are simply using the order returned by the Service layer -which returns them in the order in which the relationships between the terms were created. For example, the most recent relationship is first in a list.
Please feel free to vote for https://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/CSPACE-4805 if you'd like to see this addressed sooner than later.
-Richard
From: Talk talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org on behalf of Peter Murray pmurray@chillco.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 11:13 AM
To: CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
The Narrower and Equivalent contexts in the hierarchy section of records (storage locations, for instance) do not seem to be sorted in a meaningful way. I thought I saw an issue in Jira about this, but now I can't seem to find it. Is this a know problem, or do I perhaps have something misconfigured?
Peter
Peter Murray
Dev/Ops Lead and Project Manager
Cherry Hill Company
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org
Actually, according to the JIRA history, there was no demotion. It looks like it was created with "minor."
From: Susan STONE sstone@berkeley.edu
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 3:21 PM
To: Richard Millet
Cc: Peter Murray; CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: Re: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
And, Peter, needless to say, I didn't consider the issue "minor" when
I created it back in 2012: it got demoted.
Susan
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Richard Millet
richard.millet@lyrasis.org wrote:
Peter,
It appears that the App/UI layer are simply using the order returned by the Service layer -which returns them in the order in which the relationships between the terms were created. For example, the most recent relationship is first in a list.
Please feel free to vote for https://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/CSPACE-4805 if you'd like to see this addressed sooner than later.
-Richard
From: Talk talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org on behalf of Peter Murray pmurray@chillco.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 11:13 AM
To: CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
The Narrower and Equivalent contexts in the hierarchy section of records (storage locations, for instance) do not seem to be sorted in a meaningful way. I thought I saw an issue in Jira about this, but now I can't seem to find it. Is this a know problem, or do I perhaps have something misconfigured?
Peter
Peter Murray
Dev/Ops Lead and Project Manager
Cherry Hill Company
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectionspace.org
Ordering records in general seems to be an issue with CSpace when listing groups of records. I often search based on assigned number rather than last modified by or relationship created. Don't know if there is a way to create a general request to fix across the board....
Kara S. Vetter | Registrar
San Diego Museum of Man
619-239-2001, ext 44 | kvetter@museumofman.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Richard Millet
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 3:27 PM
To: Susan STONE
Cc: CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: Re: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
Actually, according to the JIRA history, there was no demotion. It looks like it was created with "minor."
From: Susan STONE sstone@berkeley.edu
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 3:21 PM
To: Richard Millet
Cc: Peter Murray; CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: Re: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
And, Peter, needless to say, I didn't consider the issue "minor" when I created it back in 2012: it got demoted.
Susan
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Richard Millet richard.millet@lyrasis.org wrote:
Peter,
It appears that the App/UI layer are simply using the order returned by the Service layer -which returns them in the order in which the relationships between the terms were created. For example, the most recent relationship is first in a list.
Please feel free to vote for https://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/CSPACE-4805 if you'd like to see this addressed sooner than later.
-Richard
From: Talk talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org on behalf of Peter
Murray pmurray@chillco.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 11:13 AM
To: CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
The Narrower and Equivalent contexts in the hierarchy section of records (storage locations, for instance) do not seem to be sorted in a meaningful way. I thought I saw an issue in Jira about this, but now I can't seem to find it. Is this a know problem, or do I perhaps have something misconfigured?
Peter
Peter Murray
Dev/Ops Lead and Project Manager
Cherry Hill Company
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectio
nspace.org
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectio
nspace.org
Kara,
Can you describe a little more what type of ordering/sorting you'd like to be able to do but can't?
Thanks,
Megan
Megan Forbes
CollectionSpace Program Manager
megan.forbes@lyrasis.org
917.267.9676 Cell
meganbforbes Skype
From: Talk talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org on behalf of Kara Vetter kvetter@museumofman.org
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 6:31 PM
To: Richard Millet; Susan STONE
Cc: CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: Re: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
Ordering records in general seems to be an issue with CSpace when listing groups of records. I often search based on assigned number rather than last modified by or relationship created. Don't know if there is a way to create a general request to fix across the board....
Kara S. Vetter | Registrar
San Diego Museum of Man
619-239-2001, ext 44 | kvetter@museumofman.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org] On Behalf Of Richard Millet
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 3:27 PM
To: Susan STONE
Cc: CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: Re: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
Actually, according to the JIRA history, there was no demotion. It looks like it was created with "minor."
From: Susan STONE sstone@berkeley.edu
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 3:21 PM
To: Richard Millet
Cc: Peter Murray; CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: Re: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
And, Peter, needless to say, I didn't consider the issue "minor" when I created it back in 2012: it got demoted.
Susan
On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 3:19 PM, Richard Millet richard.millet@lyrasis.org wrote:
Peter,
It appears that the App/UI layer are simply using the order returned by the Service layer -which returns them in the order in which the relationships between the terms were created. For example, the most recent relationship is first in a list.
Please feel free to vote for https://issues.collectionspace.org/browse/CSPACE-4805 if you'd like to see this addressed sooner than later.
-Richard
From: Talk talk-bounces@lists.collectionspace.org on behalf of Peter
Murray pmurray@chillco.com
Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 11:13 AM
To: CollectionSpace Talk List
Subject: [Talk] Hierarchy contexts not sorted
The Narrower and Equivalent contexts in the hierarchy section of records (storage locations, for instance) do not seem to be sorted in a meaningful way. I thought I saw an issue in Jira about this, but now I can't seem to find it. Is this a know problem, or do I perhaps have something misconfigured?
Peter
Peter Murray
Dev/Ops Lead and Project Manager
Cherry Hill Company
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectio
nspace.org
Talk mailing list
Talk@lists.collectionspace.org
http://lists.collectionspace.org/mailman/listinfo/talk_lists.collectio
nspace.org
Kara et al,
I search on accession number, and get back all kinds of results—for example 1988.054.0077 shows up ahead of and right next to 1988.054.0013. There seems to be no logic to how the results are auto-sorted. I can’t figure out how to sort them into, say, numerical order. Has anyone figured this out? Am I missing something obvious? Thanks!
—Miranda